Entries Tagged as ''

Like nailing jelly to a tree

This term is normally used to describe complex problems in computer science that cannot be completely specified for one reason or another. Generally because you are trying to achieve something that cannot be described in terms of variables and parameters (because there’s always one more).

So it is with Campaign Finance Reform.

Senators John McCain and Russ Feingold created the McCain-Feingold Bi-partisan Campaign Finance Reform Act (BCRA) to diminish the influence of monied special-interests on candidates for federal office. This has been before the congress for a number of years, but was always defeated in one house or the other. The reason that it has been defeated is because nobody really wanted to be held to account for gutting the First Amendment to the Constitution. So each house relied on the other to defeat it. The defeat was then used by one party to demagogue the other as being in favor of allowing elections to be influenced by evil special interests.

This law — which specifically denies certain types of political speech within certain periods of time before an election — is unconsitutional on its face. The Supreme Court had already upheld in the past that money IS speech, and shot down dollar limits on so-called “soft money” contributions to the political parties. They allowed limits of “hard money” contributions directly to candidates, ostensibly to make it harder to bribe a candidate. I suppose that’s an acceptable restriction, but it’s pretty specific, so it’s not easy to violate the letter OR spirit of.

Back to the Congress. They surprised themselves. Both houses of Congress passed BCRA, and it went before President George W. Bush for ratification. I suppose they might have done this in the hopes that the President would stop them from destorying the Consitution, or perhaps they were counting on a veto, so they could accuse HIM of supporting special-interests.

The president, in direct violation of his oath of office, signed BCRA into law. It is now illegal to give money above a certain amount directly to the political parties, and nobody is allowed to run an ad that specifically mentions a candidate by name within sixty days of an election. Add to this that unlimited money for campaigning can only be raised by a special kind of organization called a 527 organization (named for the section of the Internal Revenue Code that allows them to operate). In addition, the law governing 527s (which has been in effect since the 1970s) says that an organization that has 527 status is not allowed to coordinate with the candidates and parties.

Of course, this law was challenged before the ink was dry on the president’s signature. It was fast-tracked to the Supreme Court. And the Supreme Court UPHELD THE LAW. The First Amendment to the Constitution has been officially stripped of meaning.

Now we have these 527 organizations gathering money like a pond gathers scum. And they are taking out some pretty devastating ads, many of them not entirely truthful. John Kerry is whining because one of the very few pro-Bush 527s has unleashed a devastating series of ads against him. Kerry blames Bush, and wants him to make the ads stop. Of course, the 527 laws don’t allow for that, so Kerry thinks he’s got a perfect hammer to bludgeon Bush with.

Bush counters with “Let’s get rid of all the 527s!”. Kerry is flummoxed. McCain is beside himself with joy. McCain was angry that all these 527s sprung up to get all that dirty money back in to politics after he went to all that trouble to make it illegal. Bush has told McCain that he will support LEGISLATIVE ACTION to silence the 527 organizations. Understand that.

The President of the United States of America has just pledged TO ELIMINATE PAID POLITICAL SPEECH.

Will a serious person please step forward and take the reigns of this country before we go over a cliff?

Judas Fuckin’ Priest!

Sunday, August 29, 2004. Mohegan Sun Arena

Judas Fuckin’ Priest! (Okay, it didn’t actually SAY that on the tickets…)

Rob Halford is back. And he can still scream. 30 Years. These guys have been rockin’ out for 30 years. Is this a new precedent? Rockers dying of old age???

The opening act wasn’t anything to write home about. Just loud drums and screaming. Seriously - you could not hear the guitar and bass over the screaming. Although, we were sitting on the side of the stage, so actually HEARING the concert was a bit of a problem.

Priest did a pretty short set, actually. If I had to guess, I’d say it was the same as their Ozz-fest set (I wasn’t at Ozz-fest, so I can’t say for sure). I’d be that after being apart for so long, and working on a new album, they only had time to work on these few songs and get them tight enough to go on stage with them. Rob’s not been doing much lately, so he’s gotta get back in shape anyhow!

Even though I’ve never been a hard-core fan of the Priest, I’m actually looking forward to the new album. I’m really liking the resurgence of metal.

Another day, another awesome concert.

Saturday, August 28, 2004. Jones Beach Ampitheatre, Wantagh, NY.

Yes, with special guest Dream Theater.

I’d heard good things about Jones Beach. I knew that it was an outdoor venue, but that was about it. I was worried that the sound would be as muffled and muddy as it is at some of the other ampitheatre-style venues (like The Meadows in Hartford, CT). I was pleasantly wrong.

There was a bit of the highs getting muffled intermittently. I suspect the wind was moving speakers just enough to cause the problem. It didn’t do too much damage to the music, though.

I’d never seen Dream Theater before. I’d heard their music before, and I would have classified them as “Art-metal”. Kind of like a harder version of Yes. Lots of intricate music, but with crushing drums and very crunchy riffs. Judging by the shirt-count of those walking in, I’d say they have quite a dedicated following. And after seeing them play, I understand why.

Anyhow, to get to the real reason we drive all this way for a show - Yes. Same set as the first leg, with the addition of a pair of “Peace” banners on the side of the stage. Hey, can’t hurt, right? The inflatable bird was having quite a bit of fun in the breeze. Jones Beach is right on the water, and you sit facing the water, so the way the wind blows, it comes down behind you and then blasts across the stage.

Marc went to the Hartford show last weekend (which is also part of the second leg of the 35th anniversary tour), and they changed the set-list quite a bit from then. The acoustic set was the same. But it sounded bigger, somehow. In fact, I think the openness of the stage (basically, there is the roof over the stage itself, and then nothing. Completely open.) made everything sound bigger. Close to the Edge sounded bigger than I have ever heard it in my lifetime.

Chris Squire may be the only man on Earth happy that the RNC is in New York this week. He said he’s never made it across town faster, now that everyone’s left!

Everyone was absolutely brilliant, and I’ll leave it there. I’ll also be going back to Jones Beach for more shows.

Bubbles!

Started a new kit this weekend. Brewer’s Best English Brown Ale. Smelled good going in. Now it’s bubbling madly. Should be good for bottling this coming weekend.

Why none of the swift boat bullshit matters

Let’s be reasonable here, folks.

Nobody I know that is voting for Kerry is doing so because of Kerry. They are voting AGAINST BUSH. And they have said, to a person, that they would vote for a spoiled ham sandwich before voting for Bush. And nobody I know that is voting for Bush is going to be swayed by anything Kerry says, because there is nothing in his Senate career that indicates he’s going to do anything we agree with.

So we have all this sound and fury over NOTHING. It isn’t going to sway ANYONE. Face it - Kerry could have molested 15 young boys and killed three more. His support level is not going to drop. He could pull out an AK-47 and waste a school yard, and his support level would not drop. There is a VERY small percentage of undecideds this time out (I’ve heard numbers as small as 8%, whereas it was closer to 20% in 2000).

Unless the purpose of all this Vietnam bullshit is to get the few undecideds to stay home?

Politically Motivated?

How long you figure it’ll be before some random Democrat Senator or Representative says that Bush’s declaring of a disaster area in Florida is a political ploy?

I’m betting by noon Sunday at least two of them (if I had to pick names, I’d go with Daschle and Pelosi) are going to accuse Bush of acting so quickly, before the storm’s damage was even known, to gain an advantage in Florida for the November election.

Any takers?

Could you explain this please?

David Brock has written another missive about how the evil Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy is taking over America. This time, in The Republican Noise Machine: Right-Wing Media and How It [sic] Corrupts Democracy he appears to claim that the “right wing” has taken over the media and duped the American public into thinking that the media have a liberal bias. But I’m not here to argue that point.

Rather, I’m here to argue about continuity and credibility. Back in the 1990’s, David Brock did some major investigative reporting, much of it appearing in The American Spectator, that was interpreted by the dominant media of the day as nothing more than smears. Now he claims that the entire media is a right-wing smear machine.

Does this mean that everything he said about Anita Hill, and various Clinton scandals (including Troopergate) was made up out of whole cloth? If so, should we believe him now? I know that he’s spent the past several years “apologizing” for his writings back then, claiming to have been in thrall to some right-wing cabal hell-bent on world domination. But seriously, is this a case of “The next sentence is a lie”;”The previous sentence was true”?

My brain hurts. I think I’ll go do some differential equations or something easy.

And thus was the terrible leaf dispatched…

Dogs is crazy.

BARK BARK BARK! On and on for like five minutes. I finally peel myself away from working to see what the commotion is about. I’m expecting her to be barking at the neighbor’s cat again. Nope. A leaf. A crumbly gray old leaf lying on top of a weed. Barking at that thing like it was threatening to engulf the entire house in its evil, decaying grasp. She showed it. Barked at it right good. Until I moved it with the shovel.

Such a fierce protector, this one.

The Carmack does it again

Oh. My. God.

Doom 3. Incredible. No words.

Thank you Carmack.

Interesting thought

I’ve heard a few “arguments” against Iraq by people attempting to appear hawkish. These consist of one of the following statements

  • Why didn’t we attack Iran or Saudi Arabia, since they were more actively supporting terrorists
  • We should have done more to get the French and Germans (well, they say ‘our allies’) to join us

The problem with both of these arguments is that they are circulalry dependent.

We went to Iraq because it serves to isolate both Iran and Saudi Arabia, and gives us a staging area free of the Kindgom of Saudi Arabia. Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia are all on the short list. Of this I have no doubts.

As to why we don’t have the French and Germans, well, we need look no further than the Oil-for-Dictators scandal to see why they opposed Iraq. Given that they also opposed intervention in Kosovo, and for similar reasons (they were both cozy with Milosevic), we need to consider that anywhere that the U.S. interests and the French interests do not coincide, they will actively oppose us. For further evidence, I point to you to Darfur, Sudan. France has finally sent in a token contingent to alleviate (not prevent) the genocide of black muslims, animists, and christians in the Darfur region. France has major oil interests in Sudan in areas controlled by the government that has been supporting the genocide by the Arab muslim janjaweed in Darfur, hence their dilemma.

So, those of you making either of these arguments about Iraq should consider that France has interests in other oil-producing countries as well. Can we count on France to put our national security ahead of their financial interests? I doubt it.