Willfully blind.
Read this.
Then ask yourself this question:
How could anyone conclude that BUSH AND BLAIR DID THIS FOR MONEY?
Does this man truly believe that his son died for someone else’s pursuit of money? Is this grief talking, or is he serious? Has he been paying attention?
500,000 slaughtered in Rwanda, and we did nothing. And the left criticizes the US (but not too harshly, after all, Clinton was in office, and the UN said not to do anything anyhow) for allowing the slaughter.
11,000 Iraqis dead? Saddam was killing them at a rate of what, 300,000 a year? So do we get any credit for saving 289,000? Nope. Just a bunch of murderous greedy cowboys out to get contracts for Halliburton, no matter the cost in lives.
Some people really need to open their eyes and see what is going on in this world. We are on the cusp of a war of civilizations. A war that has been brewing for 700 years. And our enemies don’t have the words “peace” or “surrender” in their vocabularies.
Nick Berg was murdered in cold blood for one simple fact. He is not a specific flavor of muslim. All the rhetoric was simply convenient for the terrorists to use to manipulate the stupids around the world in the hopes that they’d commit suicide and save Zarqawi the trouble of personally cutting each and every one of their heads off.
We don’t get any options this time, kids. It’s kill or be killed. Detente is not an available solution. I suggest that anyone who believes that the invasion of Iraq was about anything other than mopping up the cesspool of islam in the middle east start reviewing some history. Start with what happened in Spain in 1492.
Hint - it didn’t involve an Italian and three boats.